MSI is improving its line of new laptops with the release new ultraportables.

The company initially revealed its MSI X320, which looks like a MacBook Air last month at CES. It’s a 13.4-inch laptop powered by 1.6GHz Intel Atom Z530.

The news is its early successor, the new x340 which packs more power but consumes lesser electricity. The computer belongs to the Consumer Ultra Low Voltage (CULV) line of processors that could be the next big thing in mobile computing.

Andy Tung, MSI’s Director of U.S. Sales introduced the product to the press. “At launch you will see [the x340 with] two specs. They are both using Intel’s Consumer ULV CPUs. One is the CULV Intel Celeron M 725 and the second one will be the Core 2 Solo SU3500,” he said.

The price of these new computers isn’t clear as of this writing. According to Tung, x340 will be around $750. The x320 will be around $700.

If you’re unsure as to what you should get, Tung gave us a pointer. “To have the best battery life on this product the Z530 is the only choice, but the CULV platform will provide better performance,” he said.

They will be available in the US this April.

Source: LaptopMag

Re-Tweet This Post

Intel Corp. revealed the microarchitecture, a blueprint for its chip that the corporation as well as some analysts consider as the killer of its smaller rival Advanced Micro Devices Inc.

Many experts see the unveiling of the microarchitecture as an indication that Intel is indeed very well ahead of AMD. Intel regularly exposes new and advanced chip design every two years, analysts see this as the reason AMD’s stock price depreciated by 5 percent in technology shares. AMD’s losses amounted to $5 billion in the past 18 months.

Apart from the new blueprint, Intel has also plans of creating what it calls an integrated memory controller. This controller shall move information between the microprocessor and the computer straight into the processor itself – beaker information transferring speed records.

Experts see this as a great development as new and modern workstations need more speed; therefore any increase in communication speed is most welcomed.

According to Intel, their new structure will triple the speed at which data can be written to memory or read back. Dubbed as Nehalem, this would also double the 3-D rendering capabilities of previous chips, taking more advantage of the Intel’s core processor technology.

Intel will finish production of the four-core Nehalem chips by the end of 2008.

Source: AP Google

Re-Tweet This Post

Intel will push the performance and capability of present day PCs by introducing a Nehalem microarchitecture-based processor. This new processor would use a quad-core chips that is intended to be used in advanced and high-end gaming computers.

According to Intel, the Nehalem-based processors will still carry the company’s popular “Core” brand. Dubbed as the Core i7, the first Nehalem desktop chip will target gamers, designers and creative professionals.

Initially, there will be two versions. The black Core i7 or the Extreme Edition will be Intel’s fastest and highest-end chips. Blue labeled chips, on the other hand will be a step down.

Upcoming Core chips that doesn’t carry code-name will be tagged as Penryn. It will be based on Intel’s older chip architecture and will have the Core 2 mark.

Intel refuses to disclose the specifications of the new Core i7, but sources revealed that it will feature a new integrated memory controller and a new breakthrough feature. Intel however hinted that the new breakthrough feature will give PC increased performance and energy efficiency.

Source: Information Week

Re-Tweet This Post

I was at a local mall yesterday when I came across several desktop and laptop units running on Windows Vista. Although the sight was a bit common nowadays, I was still curious as to processors that were powering the units since the price tags did not seem to suggest that they were high-end ones.

True enough, they were merely Celerons! It’s quite a surprise considering that many touted Vista as a gas-guzzler. In fact, the first PCs that got the “Windows Vista Capable / Ready” seal have at least dual core processors in it.

Celeron chips were originally planned to be interred with XP. However, this cheaper alternative from Intel worked perfectly fine when it played the new Microsoft OS. Could it be that the chip’s maker injected some steroids to the processor which gave it extra strength to load and run Vista?

I’m not sure of Intel made some modifications to their low-end chip. However, I noticed that the manufacturer of the units which featured Celeron processors flooded their product with a least a gigabyte of RAM. Now we all know that adding more RAM to one’s PC is like getting a complete processor upgrade altogether. This news should give hope to those who want to jump to Vista but are quite apprehensive as to the capability of their hardware.

Re-Tweet This Post

A few weeks ago, I’ve written an entry regarding the dizzying pace at which chipmakers are churning out processors in their manufacturing plants. I lamented that many of those who bought the Core Duo model felt cheated when Intel released the Core 2 Duo unit in just a short span of time after it has introduced the former.

At the rate Intel and AMD are going, one might not help but wonder on how are we going to use or what are we going to do with all that computing muscle. The two chip-making giants have been injecting steroids in their products in order to meet the processing requirements of various applications, especially Windows Vista. However, many experts are now saying that Intel and AMD might have overshot the runway by about a mile and a half.

Wait for Me

There was a time when software manufacturers were constantly whining on how slow chipmakers are in developing a processor that could fully exploit or support the full potentials of the former’s products. Indeed, the computers back then seemed to be always inadequate. Intel and AMD can’t seem to satisfy the insatiable demands of programs, especially those which involve image or video editing, for more computing power.

Things have drastically changed since then. The lot of software authors and chipmakers has taken a 180-degree turn. It’s the application manufacturers’ turn now to do be the “it” in their game of tag with Intel and AMD. Processors have not only become faster, but it also developed multiple brain or cores.

Fitting Everything in One Package

A few years ago, Consumers and chipmakers were toying with the idea of putting two processors in one motherboard. The idea seemed plausible, although those who entertained the scheme were turned off by the thought of introducing PCs that are preposterously expensive due to the fact that it has two chips.

Advances in chip-making during the past 3 years have enabled Intel and AMD to assimilate 2 or more cores into just one chip. This proved to be more economical and viable than the 2-chip unit. Both manufacturers immediately embraced the idea.

We Can Only Use One

Software manufacturers hailed the developments in the chip-making industry. Sadly, they could not yet exploit the full potentials or capabilities of the dual or multiple core chips that are already available in the market. Many of the programs that are being sold today are not designed to take advantage of the multiple processing capabilities of the chips. Hence, the extra power of the CPU is wasted. It’s as if the computer is just running on a single core processor.

Rude Awakening

Program makers admit that they are lagging behind in the race. In the recently held Windows Hardware Engineering Conference (WinHEC) in Los Angeles, software giants urged each other to come up with products that would be able flex every muscle of the computer. Even this year’s most talked-about application, Windows Vista, is not designed to make use of every core of multiple-brained chips. Microsoft’s Ty Carlson expressed the need for the next Windows to be able to fully utilize the number of processing cores that would be hailed or considered as the industry standard in the future or during the period when the new OS would be released.

Re-Tweet This Post

There will come a time (and it’s sooner than you think) when that dual or quad core processor of yours will become obsolete and will be replaced by a new chip that is 10-20 times more powerful. The news of its impending arrival has been received with both elation and frustration. Some are accusing Intel and AMD of flooding the market with beta chips, and that the two companies have been less candid with consumers on the release dates of their latest models.

Indeed, it would seem that Intel and AMD are taking us for a ride. It wasn’t long ago when Intel bannered its Core Duo processor as the best in the industry. Many rushed to buy new laptops and desktops that have the new chip. A few months later, Intel released the Core 2 Duo processor. Needless to say, the new chip’s predecessor became a collector’s item overnight.

Deceived

Many consumers bought the Core Duo processor, thinking that it’s Intel’s long-term replacement for the Pentium 4. It’s not surprising then, that they felt cheated when Intel released the Core 2 Duo in just a short span of time after it flooded the market with Core Duo chips. They said that Intel should’ve been candid enough to divulge that they will be coming up with another chip that’s twice as powerful as the Core Duo.

I’m one with those who feel bad about the way Intel plays in the market. Of course, it’s a good business strategy. However, consumers might also fight back by delaying the purchase of the chip-maker’s new releases. This could be very detrimental to Intel’s fiscal health, considering that consumers have the ability to delay the purchase of things, even essential ones, for an unreasonable length of time. The top producer of computer processors could then face the dilemma of having to advertise or banner both chips as the best in the market.

Patience Consumes Time, But Saves Money

You might contend that such a situation wouldn’t be a very big headache for Intel. In fact, it might even help them in reaching both spectrums of the market. The company has been successful before in marketing its Celeron and Pentium 4 chips. The former is considerably weaker compared to the latter. However, the Celeron is also substantially cheaper than the Pentium 4 and other more powerful processors. Intel marketed the Celeron to low-income consumers, while aggressively pushed for the use of its high-end chips to those who have plenty of cash to spare.

While the strategy proved to be successful for Intel in their Celeron-Pentium “situation,” especially in developing countries, such a scheme may not be applicable to its present dilemma. For one thing, the price discrepancy of the Core Duo and the Core 2 Duo is not that wide, if there’s any at all. Even if they do decide to cut the price tag of the weaker chip, I don’t think consumers would take a bite at it since they’re already anticipating the release of the next line of processors that Intel and AMD would be releasing within the year or early next year.

Re-Tweet This Post